Joe Hoyle ↗
Accounting
- Quality
- 4.53
- Difficulty
- 4.38
- Reviews
- 74
I’m very extra.
All time · At least 4/5 for both raw quality and difficulty
Yes. Hard class, still left a good review. Huge day for personal growth.
Accounting
History
Accounting
Economics
Sorted by adjusted quality. Enough reviews required. Nobody measured how much entered anyone’s brain.
All time · Three eligible professors with the largest spread in quality ratings
Yes. Anonymous reviews are biased. WOW. Groundbreaking and earth-shattering.
Average quality 3.19 · Spread 1.94
Average quality 3.08 · Spread 1.93
Average quality 2.96 · Spread 1.84
It measures how far apart the individual ratings are. A bigger number means the reviewers disagreed more. It does not mean the professor was worse.
Rated higher than expected. Highly recommend.
Accounting
Economics
Economics
English
Alpha is rating relative to expectations, not an official RMP score. Positive means higher than expected.
No. We complain about the same amount every year. Tradition matters.
The mix of professors and courses changes every year, so this is not a controlled test of student bitchiness. Also, 2026 is partial.
Finance is the hardest part of Robins. Man, those Excel coloring books must be brutal.
Raw department averages. Student ratings, not proof that one major requires more work.
All time · Robins Business vs. Gottwald Sciences
Adjusted difference in difficulty points · 95% CI · SE 0.115 · R² 0.040
Controls: course level + review year. Model N differs from the raw review total; exact exclusion rules were not supplied. Source: business_vs_science_results.csv.
After accounting for course level and review year, Robins reviews still report lower difficulty.
Economics is excluded from Robins in both comparisons. This is an association in self-selected reviews, not a causal effect of attending a school.
The numbers say Robins is easier. They also say Jepson is harder than Gottwald. You can’t accept one and call bullshit on the other.
Adjusted difference in difficulty points · 95% CI · SE 0.109 · R² 0.032
Controls: course level + review year. Model N differs from the raw review total; exact exclusion rules were not supplied. Source: business_vs_science_results.csv.
After accounting for course level and review year, Robins reviews still report lower difficulty, even with Math and CS included.
Broad STEM raw mean is a review-weighted combination of the supplied Gottwald and Math & CS summaries. Economics is excluded from Robins in both comparisons. This is an association in self-selected reviews, not a causal effect of attending a school.
All time · Descriptive review averages
| Difficulty score | Average quality | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.15 | 883 |
| 2 | 4.26 | 2,431 |
| 3 | 4.10 | 4,060 |
| 4 | 3.64 | 3,309 |
| 5 | 2.51 | 1,556 |
Harder classes receive lower ratings. Whether that is academic judgment or post-final emotion is between us.
Each point is the average quality score for reviews at that difficulty level. It shows the pattern; it cannot prove that difficulty caused the rating.