← All departments
A&S Humanities / Social Sciences / Arts

Psychology

Reviews336
Professors37
Quality4.15
Difficulty3.08
Difficulty rank#16
Quality rank#4

All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.

Within the department

Department rating summaries

Highest ratedKevin Webster ↗4.59
Highest reported difficultyCindy Bukach ↗3.54
Lowest reported difficultyScott Allison ↗2.82
Highest rating relative to expectationsKevin Webster ↗0.39
Most disagreement in ratingsCindy Bukach ↗1.69

Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.

Explore professors

37 professors · All time · 1+ reviews
Higher ratings · lower difficulty
Higher ratings · higher difficulty
Lower ratings · lower difficulty
Lower ratings · higher difficulty
One dot = one professor · Size = review countDashed lines = Richmond review averages

Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.

Professor ratings

Kevin Webster

Psychology · 40 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
2.9/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
4.59
Adjusted difficulty
3.01
Alpha
0.39
Rating spread (SD)
0.16
Scott Allison

Psychology · 27 reviews

Quality
4.2/5
Difficulty
2.6/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
4.02
Adjusted difficulty
2.82
Alpha
-0.06
Rating spread (SD)
1.18
Cindy Bukach

Psychology · 20 reviews

Quality
3.0/5
Difficulty
3.9/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
3.40
Adjusted difficulty
3.54
Alpha
-0.38
Rating spread (SD)
1.69
. Bagwell

Psychology · 10 reviews

Quality
4.6/5
Difficulty
3.2/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.26

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Adam Stanaland

Psychology · 6 reviews

Quality
4.8/5
Difficulty
3.0/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.41

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Andrew Bell

Psychology · 5 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
2.8/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Arella Gussow

Psychology · 2 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
3.5/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Arlenis Santana

Psychology · 1 review

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
2.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
—

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Arryn Robbins

Psychology · 4 reviews

Quality
4.8/5
Difficulty
2.8/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.50

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Barbara Sholley

Psychology · 18 reviews

Quality
3.3/5
Difficulty
4.1/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.57

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Beth Crawford

Psychology · 7 reviews

Quality
4.1/5
Difficulty
3.6/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.46

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Brandon Ng

Psychology · 2 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
3.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Brittany Alperin

Psychology · 1 review

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
1.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
—

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Camilla Nonterah

Psychology · 17 reviews

Quality
2.7/5
Difficulty
3.1/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.49

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Craig Kinsley

Psychology · 13 reviews

Quality
4.2/5
Difficulty
2.4/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.80

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

David Landy

Psychology · 7 reviews

Quality
4.6/5
Difficulty
3.1/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.79

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

David Leary

Psychology · 14 reviews

Quality
3.4/5
Difficulty
4.1/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.02

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Deborah Carvelli

Psychology · 2 reviews

Quality
4.5/5
Difficulty
3.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.71

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Elizabeth Gross

Psychology · 2 reviews

Quality
4.0/5
Difficulty
1.5/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Jacy Jacob

Psychology · 2 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
2.5/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Jane Berry

Psychology · 18 reviews

Quality
4.2/5
Difficulty
3.1/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.11

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Janelle Peifer

Psychology · 7 reviews

Quality
3.3/5
Difficulty
3.0/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.60

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Karen Kochel

Psychology · 16 reviews

Quality
4.0/5
Difficulty
2.9/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.37

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Katie Roderick

Psychology · 5 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
2.2/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Kelly Lambert

Psychology · 11 reviews

Quality
3.7/5
Difficulty
3.5/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.27

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Kristen Lindgren

Psychology · 4 reviews

Quality
3.5/5
Difficulty
4.5/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.73

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Kristjen Lundberg

Psychology · 14 reviews

Quality
4.7/5
Difficulty
3.5/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.61

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Laura Knouse

Psychology · 19 reviews

Quality
4.7/5
Difficulty
2.7/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.58

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Lisa Jobe-Shields

Psychology · 1 review

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
3.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
—

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Maruti Mishra

Psychology · 4 reviews

Quality
3.8/5
Difficulty
2.5/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.89

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Matthew Lowder

Psychology · 12 reviews

Quality
4.8/5
Difficulty
2.7/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.87

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Megan Bookhout

Psychology · 5 reviews

Quality
4.8/5
Difficulty
3.0/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.45

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Peter Leviness

Psychology · 9 reviews

Quality
4.7/5
Difficulty
2.3/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.50

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Rashelle Hayes

Psychology · 5 reviews

Quality
2.8/5
Difficulty
3.4/5
More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
1.30

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Richard Franssen

Psychology · 1 review

Quality
3.0/5
Difficulty
2.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
—

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Sarah (Kitty) Tryon

Psychology · 3 reviews

Quality
3.0/5
Difficulty
3.7/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
2.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

Tom Campbell

Psychology · 2 reviews

Quality
5.0/5
Difficulty
2.0/5

Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.

More numbers
Adjusted quality
—
Adjusted difficulty
—
Rating spread (SD)
0.00

No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.

ProfessorQualityDifficultyReviewsAdjusted qualityAdjusted difficultyCompare
Kevin WebsterPsychology4.982.93404.593.01
Scott AllisonPsychology4.192.56274.022.82
Cindy BukachPsychology3.003.90203.403.54
. BagwellPsychology4.603.2010——
Adam StanalandPsychology4.833.006——
Andrew BellPsychology5.002.805——
Arella GussowPsychology5.003.502——
Arlenis SantanaPsychology5.002.001——
Arryn RobbinsPsychology4.752.754——
Barbara SholleyPsychology3.334.0618——
Beth CrawfordPsychology4.143.577——
Brandon NgPsychology5.003.002——
Brittany AlperinPsychology5.001.001——
Camilla NonterahPsychology2.713.0617——
Craig KinsleyPsychology4.152.3813——
David LandyPsychology4.573.147——
David LearyPsychology3.434.0714——
Deborah CarvelliPsychology4.503.002——
Elizabeth GrossPsychology4.001.502——
Jacy JacobPsychology5.002.502——
Jane BerryPsychology4.223.0618——
Janelle PeiferPsychology3.293.007——
Karen KochelPsychology4.002.9416——
Katie RoderickPsychology5.002.205——
Kelly LambertPsychology3.733.5511——
Kristen LindgrenPsychology3.504.504——
Kristjen LundbergPsychology4.713.5014——
Laura KnousePsychology4.682.6819——
Lisa Jobe-ShieldsPsychology5.003.001——
Maruti MishraPsychology3.752.504——
Matthew LowderPsychology4.752.6712——
Megan BookhoutPsychology4.803.005——
Peter LevinessPsychology4.672.339——
Rashelle HayesPsychology2.803.405——
Richard FranssenPsychology3.002.001——
Sarah (Kitty) TryonPsychology3.003.673——
Tom CampbellPsychology5.002.002——

Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗