Physics · 38 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.80
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.55
- Alpha
- 0.19
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.40
Gottwald Sciences
Physics
Reviews183
Professors16
Quality3.70
Difficulty3.33
Difficulty rank#8
Quality rank#19
All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.
Within the department
Department rating summaries
Highest ratedMatt Trawick ↗3.80
Highest reported difficultyMatt Trawick ↗3.55
Lowest reported difficultyTed Bunn ↗3.26
Highest rating relative to expectationsMatt Trawick ↗0.19
Most disagreement in ratingsMariama de Sousa Dias ↗1.93
Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.
Explore professors
Higher ratings · lower difficulty
Higher ratings · higher difficulty
Lower ratings · lower difficulty
Lower ratings · higher difficulty
One dot = one professor · Size = review countDashed lines = Richmond review averages
Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.
Professor ratings
Physics · 25 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.74
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.26
- Alpha
- 0.05
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.38
Physics · 24 reviews
- Quality
- 3.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.41
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.49
- Alpha
- -0.35
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.93
Physics · 7 reviews
- Quality
- 4.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.49
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 1.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.5/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 11 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.83
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 1 review
- Quality
- 2.0/5
- Difficulty
- 4.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 4.6/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.55
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 1.7/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.15
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 8 reviews
- Quality
- 4.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.20
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 11 reviews
- Quality
- 3.5/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.51
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 3.4/5
- Difficulty
- 3.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.34
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 4.8/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.45
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 16 reviews
- Quality
- 3.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.54
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 8 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.75
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Physics · 11 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.21
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
| Professor | Quality | Difficulty | Reviews | Adjusted quality | Adjusted difficulty | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt TrawickPhysics | 3.74 | 38 | 3.80 | 3.55 | ||
| Ted BunnPhysics | 3.32 | 25 | 3.74 | 3.26 | ||
| Mariama de Sousa DiasPhysics | 3.75 | 24 | 3.41 | 3.49 | ||
| Alina CichockiPhysics | 2.43 | 7 | — | — | ||
| Bharathi SubramaniasivaPhysics | 3.33 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Chanda SamantaPhysics | 3.50 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Christine HelmsPhysics | 3.27 | 11 | — | — | ||
| Con BeausangPhysics | 4.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Cornelius BeausangPhysics | 3.40 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Haw ChengPhysics | 1.67 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Henry NebelPhysics | 2.50 | 8 | — | — | ||
| Jack SingalPhysics | 3.27 | 11 | — | — | ||
| Jerry GilfoylePhysics | 3.60 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Mirela FeteaPhysics | 2.80 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Ovidiu LipanPhysics | 3.00 | 16 | — | — | ||
| Shaun SerejPhysics | 3.13 | 8 | — | — | ||
| William HodgePhysics | 3.36 | 11 | — | — |
Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗