Marketing · 25 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 2.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.09
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.68
- Alpha
- 0.12
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.07
Robins Business
Marketing
Reviews171
Professors16
Quality3.76
Difficulty2.95
Difficulty rank#21
Quality rank#17
All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.
Within the department
Department rating summaries
Highest ratedWilliam (Bill) Bergman ↗4.09
Highest reported difficulty. Babb ↗3.54
Lowest reported difficultyWilliam (Bill) Bergman ↗2.68
Highest rating relative to expectationsDana Lascu ↗0.14
Most disagreement in ratingsDana Lascu ↗1.33
Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.
Explore professors
Higher ratings · lower difficulty
Higher ratings · higher difficulty
Lower ratings · lower difficulty
Lower ratings · higher difficulty
One dot = one professor · Size = review countDashed lines = Richmond review averages
Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.
Professor ratings
Marketing · 34 reviews
- Quality
- 4.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.93
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.99
- Alpha
- 0.14
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.33
Marketing · 20 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.53
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.54
- Alpha
- 0.03
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.16
Marketing · 10 reviews
- Quality
- 2.6/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.26
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 1 review
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.7/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.53
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 2.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 2.08
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 7 reviews
- Quality
- 4.6/5
- Difficulty
- 2.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.79
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 9 reviews
- Quality
- 3.1/5
- Difficulty
- 2.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.54
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 15 reviews
- Quality
- 3.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.75
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 18 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.58
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 1.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.15
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 4 reviews
- Quality
- 4.8/5
- Difficulty
- 1.8/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.50
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 8 reviews
- Quality
- 4.6/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.52
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Marketing · 6 reviews
- Quality
- 4.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.82
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
| Professor | Quality | Difficulty | Reviews | Adjusted quality | Adjusted difficulty | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William (Bill) BergmanMarketing | 2.28 | 25 | 4.09 | 2.68 | ||
| Dana LascuMarketing | 2.88 | 34 | 3.93 | 2.99 | ||
| . BabbMarketing | 3.90 | 20 | 3.53 | 3.54 | ||
| Adam MarquardtMarketing | 3.20 | 10 | — | — | ||
| Jeff GrollmanMarketing | 2.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Joel MierMarketing | 3.00 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Katie GilstrapMarketing | 3.67 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Kiersten MaryottMarketing | 3.33 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Nancy RidgwayMarketing | 2.00 | 7 | — | — | ||
| Patricia TorresMarketing | 2.44 | 9 | — | — | ||
| Raika SadegheinMarketing | 3.53 | 15 | — | — | ||
| Randy RaggioMarketing | 3.28 | 18 | — | — | ||
| Raymond (Pat) FisheMarketing | 2.00 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Robert StoneMarketing | 1.75 | 4 | — | — | ||
| Sara HansonMarketing | 3.00 | 8 | — | — | ||
| Tom MyersMarketing | 2.83 | 6 | — | — |
Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗