Leadership · 39 reviews
- Quality
- 4.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.44
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.33
- Alpha
- 0.54
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.54
Jepson
Leadership
Reviews428
Professors32
Quality3.91
Difficulty3.31
Difficulty rank#10
Quality rank#12
All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.
Within the department
Department rating summaries
Highest ratedJulian Hayter ↗4.44
Highest reported difficultyLauren Henley ↗3.49
Lowest reported difficultyThomas Shields ↗2.90
Highest rating relative to expectationsJulian Hayter ↗0.54
Most disagreement in ratingsLauren Henley ↗1.94
Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.
Explore professors
Higher ratings · lower difficulty
Higher ratings · higher difficulty
Lower ratings · lower difficulty
Lower ratings · higher difficulty
One dot = one professor · Size = review countDashed lines = Richmond review averages
Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.
Professor ratings
Leadership · 33 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.14
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.90
- Alpha
- 0.15
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.99
Leadership · 45 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.11
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.32
- Alpha
- 0.24
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.98
Leadership · 32 reviews
- Quality
- 3.9/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.89
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.22
- Alpha
- 0.02
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.32
Leadership · 20 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.80
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.37
- Alpha
- -0.04
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.74
Leadership · 26 reviews
- Quality
- 3.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.46
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.49
- Alpha
- -0.35
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.94
Leadership · 26 reviews
- Quality
- 3.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.44
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.47
- Alpha
- -0.40
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.43
Leadership · 8 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.53
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 14 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.89
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 4 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 4.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.73
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 9 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.09
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.14
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 9 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.22
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 8 reviews
- Quality
- 3.1/5
- Difficulty
- 4.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.64
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.71
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 19 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.32
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 11 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.19
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 1 review
- Quality
- 4.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 4 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.71
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 17 reviews
- Quality
- 4.0/5
- Difficulty
- 4.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.94
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 13 reviews
- Quality
- 1.9/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.38
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 11 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 7 reviews
- Quality
- 4.4/5
- Difficulty
- 2.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.79
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 1 review
- Quality
- 2.0/5
- Difficulty
- 4.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 9 reviews
- Quality
- 2.6/5
- Difficulty
- 4.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.59
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 1 review
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 4.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 2.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.41
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 6 reviews
- Quality
- 2.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.72
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 1 review
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 15 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.45
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.14
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Leadership · 19 reviews
- Quality
- 4.6/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.90
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
| Professor | Quality | Difficulty | Reviews | Adjusted quality | Adjusted difficulty | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julian HayterLeadership | 3.41 | 39 | 4.44 | 3.33 | ||
| Thomas ShieldsLeadership | 2.73 | 33 | 4.14 | 2.90 | ||
| Peter KaufmanLeadership | 3.38 | 45 | 4.11 | 3.32 | ||
| Thad WilliamsonLeadership | 3.25 | 32 | 3.89 | 3.22 | ||
| Javier HidalgoLeadership | 3.55 | 20 | 3.80 | 3.37 | ||
| Lauren HenleyLeadership | 3.73 | 26 | 3.46 | 3.49 | ||
| Kristin BezioLeadership | 3.69 | 26 | 3.44 | 3.47 | ||
| AL GoethalsLeadership | 3.25 | 8 | — | — | ||
| Allison ArcherLeadership | 2.67 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Ana MitricLeadership | 3.29 | 14 | — | — | ||
| Bo ParkLeadership | 2.50 | 4 | — | — | ||
| Bo Yun ParkLeadership | 3.33 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Chris von RuedenLeadership | 3.56 | 9 | — | — | ||
| Chris vonRuedenLeadership | 3.20 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Crystal HoytLeadership | 3.44 | 9 | — | — | ||
| David WilkinsLeadership | 4.00 | 8 | — | — | ||
| Dejun Tony KongLeadership | 2.00 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Don ForsythLeadership | 2.63 | 19 | — | — | ||
| Douglas HicksLeadership | 3.27 | 11 | — | — | ||
| Elizabeth FaierLeadership | 3.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Ernesto SemanLeadership | 3.25 | 4 | — | — | ||
| Gary McDowellLeadership | 4.41 | 17 | — | — | ||
| Gil HickmanLeadership | 2.77 | 13 | — | — | ||
| Haley HarwellLeadership | 2.91 | 11 | — | — | ||
| J. Thomas WrenLeadership | 2.43 | 7 | — | — | ||
| Jeffrey SedgwickLeadership | 4.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Joanne CiullaLeadership | 4.56 | 9 | — | — | ||
| Joshua WalkerLeadership | 4.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Karen ZiviLeadership | 2.50 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Marilie CoetseeLeadership | 3.83 | 6 | — | — | ||
| Sam DirectorLeadership | 3.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Terry PriceLeadership | 3.60 | 15 | — | — | ||
| Vladimir ChloubaLeadership | 2.80 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Volha (Olga) ChykinaLeadership | 2.47 | 19 | — | — |
Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗