Languages · 35 reviews
- Quality
- 4.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.35
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.70
- Alpha
- 0.24
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.68
A&S Humanities / Social Sciences / Arts
Languages
Reviews881
Professors53
Quality4.02
Difficulty2.93
Difficulty rank#23
Quality rank#6
All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.
Within the department
Department rating summaries
Highest ratedHilary Raymond ↗4.35
Highest reported difficultyAkira Suzuki ↗3.73
Lowest reported difficultyMartin Sulzer-Reichel ↗2.21
Highest rating relative to expectationsJulie Baker ↗0.33
Most disagreement in ratingsRicardo Ramos-Tremolada ↗1.51
Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.
Explore professors
Higher ratings · lower difficulty
Higher ratings · higher difficulty
Lower ratings · lower difficulty
Lower ratings · higher difficulty
One dot = one professor · Size = review countDashed lines = Richmond review averages
Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.
Professor ratings
Languages · 32 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.23
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.78
- Alpha
- 0.22
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.92
Languages · 25 reviews
- Quality
- 4.6/5
- Difficulty
- 2.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.23
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.64
- Alpha
- 0.13
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.77
Languages · 30 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.20
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.63
- Alpha
- 0.08
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.07
Languages · 25 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.18
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.84
- Alpha
- 0.12
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.87
Languages · 60 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.11
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.01
- Alpha
- 0.15
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.12
Languages · 55 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.06
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.57
- Alpha
- 0.33
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.01
Languages · 46 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.05
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.89
- Alpha
- 0.04
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.07
Languages · 38 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.04
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.72
- Alpha
- -0.01
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.89
Languages · 35 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 1.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.02
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.21
- Alpha
- -0.24
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.94
Languages · 22 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.00
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.54
- Alpha
- 0.30
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.85
Languages · 35 reviews
- Quality
- 3.9/5
- Difficulty
- 3.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.88
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.14
- Alpha
- -0.04
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.31
Languages · 21 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 2.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.78
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.04
- Alpha
- -0.07
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.30
Languages · 24 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.75
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.33
- Alpha
- -0.09
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.20
Languages · 44 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.72
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.32
- Alpha
- -0.08
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.20
Languages · 29 reviews
- Quality
- 3.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.72
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.97
- Alpha
- -0.25
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.45
Languages · 34 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 4.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.69
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.73
- Alpha
- 0.04
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.35
Languages · 26 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.50
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.45
- Alpha
- -0.19
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.51
Languages · 27 reviews
- Quality
- 2.6/5
- Difficulty
- 4.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.13
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.69
- Alpha
- -0.39
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.36
Languages · 1 review
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 14 reviews
- Quality
- 3.4/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.34
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 19 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 1.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 4 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.3/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 18 reviews
- Quality
- 3.9/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.76
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 18 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.04
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 1 review
- Quality
- 2.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 12 reviews
- Quality
- 2.0/5
- Difficulty
- 4.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.54
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 18 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.49
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 17 reviews
- Quality
- 2.3/5
- Difficulty
- 1.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.16
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 17 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 2.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.37
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 6 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.55
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 12 reviews
- Quality
- 3.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.11
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 1 review
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 1.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- —
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 1.3/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.58
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 12 reviews
- Quality
- 4.4/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.90
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Languages · 6 reviews
- Quality
- 5.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
| Professor | Quality | Difficulty | Reviews | Adjusted quality | Adjusted difficulty | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilary RaymondLanguages | 2.43 | 35 | 4.35 | 2.70 | ||
| Yvonne HowellLanguages | 2.53 | 32 | 4.23 | 2.78 | ||
| Angel Otero-BlancoLanguages | 2.20 | 25 | 4.23 | 2.64 | ||
| Olivier DelersLanguages | 2.27 | 30 | 4.20 | 2.63 | ||
| Lidia RadiLanguages | 2.56 | 25 | 4.18 | 2.84 | ||
| Thomas BonfiglioLanguages | 2.95 | 60 | 4.11 | 3.01 | ||
| Julie BakerLanguages | 3.71 | 55 | 4.06 | 3.57 | ||
| Dixon AbreuLanguages | 2.76 | 46 | 4.05 | 2.89 | ||
| Ted PeeblesLanguages | 2.47 | 38 | 4.04 | 2.72 | ||
| Martin Sulzer-ReichelLanguages | 1.66 | 35 | 4.02 | 2.21 | ||
| Kathrin BowerLanguages | 3.86 | 22 | 4.00 | 3.54 | ||
| Sharon FeldmanLanguages | 3.11 | 35 | 3.88 | 3.14 | ||
| Lorenza MarcinLanguages | 2.90 | 21 | 3.78 | 3.04 | ||
| Aurora Hermida-RuizLanguages | 3.46 | 24 | 3.75 | 3.33 | ||
| Sara PappasLanguages | 3.39 | 44 | 3.72 | 3.32 | ||
| Kasongo KapangaLanguages | 2.83 | 29 | 3.72 | 2.97 | ||
| Akira SuzukiLanguages | 4.06 | 34 | 3.69 | 3.73 | ||
| Ricardo Ramos-TremoladaLanguages | 3.65 | 26 | 3.50 | 3.45 | ||
| Marianella BelliardLanguages | 4.07 | 27 | 3.13 | 3.69 | ||
| Alaa MagablehLanguages | 2.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Alicia Lopez OpereLanguages | 2.50 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Alvaro KaempferLanguages | 3.21 | 14 | — | — | ||
| Boston WoolfolkLanguages | 2.63 | 19 | — | — | ||
| Brantley NicholsonLanguages | 1.80 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Caitlin GiustinianoLanguages | 2.25 | 4 | — | — | ||
| Carlos ValenciaLanguages | 2.72 | 18 | — | — | ||
| Caroline WeistLanguages | 3.39 | 18 | — | — | ||
| Catherine AdoyoLanguages | 3.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Claudia FermanLanguages | 4.17 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Dieter GunkelLanguages | 3.44 | 18 | — | — | ||
| Dulce LawrenceLanguages | 1.76 | 17 | — | — | ||
| Elena ProkhorovaLanguages | 3.00 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Francoise Ravaux-KirkpatrickLanguages | 2.12 | 17 | — | — | ||
| Gengsong GaoLanguages | 2.67 | 6 | — | — | ||
| Jannette Amaral-RodriguezLanguages | 3.42 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Jianru YangLanguages | 1.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Jie YaoLanguages | 1.33 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Juidth BuchananLanguages | 2.58 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Jumana Al-AhmadLanguages | 2.60 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Kamal GasimovLanguages | 3.50 | 6 | — | — |
Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗