Economics · 58 reviews
- Quality
- 4.9/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.62
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.07
- Alpha
- 0.80
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.45
Economics
Economics
Reviews1,123
Professors41
Quality3.65
Difficulty3.35
Difficulty rank#7
Quality rank#20
All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.
Within the department
Department rating summaries
Highest ratedSaif Mehkari ↗4.62
Highest reported difficultyMarie McGoldrick ↗4.06
Lowest reported difficultyRobert Nicholson ↗2.52
Highest rating relative to expectationsRobert Dolan ↗0.84
Most disagreement in ratingsMarie McGoldrick ↗1.67
Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.
Explore professors
Higher ratings · lower difficulty
Higher ratings · higher difficulty
Lower ratings · lower difficulty
Lower ratings · higher difficulty
One dot = one professor · Size = review countDashed lines = Richmond review averages
Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.
Professor ratings
Economics · 37 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.14
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.78
- Alpha
- 0.17
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.82
Economics · 34 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.13
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.25
- Alpha
- 0.36
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.07
Economics · 23 reviews
- Quality
- 4.4/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.12
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.88
- Alpha
- 0.21
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.23
Economics · 49 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 4.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.12
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.99
- Alpha
- 0.84
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.13
Economics · 31 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.04
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.21
- Alpha
- 0.21
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.95
Economics · 20 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 1.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.03
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.52
- Alpha
- 0.05
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.02
Economics · 43 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.99
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.11
- Alpha
- 0.16
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.32
Economics · 20 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 4.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.93
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.67
- Alpha
- 0.31
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.19
Economics · 37 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.77
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.31
- Alpha
- 0.18
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.38
Economics · 49 reviews
- Quality
- 3.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.1/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.77
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.11
- Alpha
- 0.08
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.33
Economics · 45 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 3.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.63
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.27
- Alpha
- -0.16
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.44
Economics · 21 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.57
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.19
- Alpha
- -0.24
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.53
Economics · 100 reviews
- Quality
- 3.5/5
- Difficulty
- 4.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.54
- Adjusted difficulty
- 4.06
- Alpha
- 0.23
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.67
Economics · 43 reviews
- Quality
- 3.4/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.54
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.22
- Alpha
- -0.29
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.43
Economics · 33 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.49
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.62
- Alpha
- -0.06
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.55
Economics · 177 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 3.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.39
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.74
- Alpha
- -0.13
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.47
Economics · 32 reviews
- Quality
- 2.8/5
- Difficulty
- 3.9/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.20
- Adjusted difficulty
- 3.61
- Alpha
- -0.38
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.65
Economics · 71 reviews
- Quality
- 2.8/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 3.05
- Adjusted difficulty
- 2.83
- Alpha
- -0.87
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.21
Economics · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.84
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 1.0/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.00
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 5 reviews
- Quality
- 2.2/5
- Difficulty
- 2.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.84
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 13 reviews
- Quality
- 3.3/5
- Difficulty
- 2.8/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.25
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 19 reviews
- Quality
- 4.3/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.75
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 13 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 3.2/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.30
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 17 reviews
- Quality
- 3.6/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.06
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 3.5/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 2.12
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 11 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.04
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 6 reviews
- Quality
- 3.5/5
- Difficulty
- 1.5/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.22
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 19 reviews
- Quality
- 1.5/5
- Difficulty
- 4.3/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.90
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 2.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.5/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.71
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 13 reviews
- Quality
- 4.2/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.01
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 4 reviews
- Quality
- 4.0/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.82
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 10 reviews
- Quality
- 2.9/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.29
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 2 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.71
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 12 reviews
- Quality
- 2.9/5
- Difficulty
- 3.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.51
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 18 reviews
- Quality
- 3.5/5
- Difficulty
- 2.6/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.38
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 3 reviews
- Quality
- 4.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.58
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 10 reviews
- Quality
- 2.7/5
- Difficulty
- 2.7/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 1.49
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Economics · 12 reviews
- Quality
- 4.1/5
- Difficulty
- 3.0/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- —
- Adjusted difficulty
- —
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.67
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
| Professor | Quality | Difficulty | Reviews | Adjusted quality | Adjusted difficulty | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saif MehkariEconomics | 3.03 | 58 | 4.62 | 3.07 | ||
| Chad CurtisEconomics | 2.57 | 37 | 4.14 | 2.78 | ||
| Andrea WaddleEconomics | 3.29 | 34 | 4.13 | 3.25 | ||
| Kayleigh McCraryEconomics | 2.61 | 23 | 4.12 | 2.88 | ||
| Robert DolanEconomics | 4.33 | 49 | 4.12 | 3.99 | ||
| Tom ZylkinEconomics | 3.23 | 31 | 4.04 | 3.21 | ||
| Robert NicholsonEconomics | 1.85 | 20 | 4.03 | 2.52 | ||
| Shakun MagoEconomics | 3.07 | 43 | 3.99 | 3.11 | ||
| Alexander PersaudEconomics | 4.15 | 20 | 3.93 | 3.67 | ||
| John WightEconomics | 3.38 | 37 | 3.77 | 3.31 | ||
| Daniel MacKayEconomics | 3.08 | 49 | 3.77 | 3.11 | ||
| Huyen CurtisEconomics | 3.31 | 45 | 3.63 | 3.27 | ||
| Neeraja GuptaEconomics | 3.19 | 21 | 3.57 | 3.19 | ||
| Marie McGoldrickEconomics | 4.23 | 100 | 3.54 | 4.06 | ||
| Timothy HayesEconomics | 3.23 | 43 | 3.54 | 3.22 | ||
| James MonksEconomics | 3.88 | 33 | 3.49 | 3.62 | ||
| Erik CraftEconomics | 3.80 | 177 | 3.39 | 3.74 | ||
| Maia LinaskEconomics | 3.88 | 32 | 3.20 | 3.61 | ||
| Craig HeinickeEconomics | 2.73 | 71 | 3.05 | 2.83 | ||
| Angela VanDerwerkenEconomics | 2.60 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Ardavan MobasheriEconomics | 2.50 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Bill DickinsonEconomics | 2.20 | 5 | — | — | ||
| Binish RijalEconomics | 2.77 | 13 | — | — | ||
| Collin RabeEconomics | 2.63 | 19 | — | — | ||
| Dean CroushoreEconomics | 3.15 | 13 | — | — | ||
| Durga GautamEconomics | 2.59 | 17 | — | — | ||
| Floyd DuncanEconomics | 3.00 | 2 | — | — | ||
| George HofferEconomics | 2.64 | 11 | — | — | ||
| Hari LuitelEconomics | 1.50 | 6 | — | — | ||
| Julien IsnardEconomics | 4.26 | 19 | — | — | ||
| Kevin ChristensenEconomics | 2.50 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Lisa VoeksEconomics | 2.69 | 13 | — | — | ||
| Maria WesterfieldEconomics | 3.00 | 4 | — | — | ||
| Matthew WilsonEconomics | 2.70 | 10 | — | — | ||
| Mishita MehraEconomics | 3.00 | 2 | — | — | ||
| Olena MykhaylovaEconomics | 3.42 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Robert CookEconomics | 2.61 | 18 | — | — | ||
| Sebastian LaumerEconomics | 2.67 | 3 | — | — | ||
| Tim SchillingEconomics | 2.70 | 10 | — | — | ||
| Volker GrzimekEconomics | 3.00 | 12 | — | — |
Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗