Accounting · 74 reviews
- Quality
- 4.5/5
- Difficulty
- 4.4/5
More numbers
- Adjusted quality
- 4.37
- Adjusted difficulty
- 4.12
- Alpha
- 0.89
- Rating spread (SD)
- 0.91
All-time supplied department values. Ranks compare the 27 supplied departments. The professor controls below apply to professor data only.
Department standouts are subsets of eligible professor scores, not additional official awards. Quality and difficulty use Bayesian scores. Alpha is custom: positive means higher ratings than expected for difficulty, department, and year.
Both scales run from 1 to 5. Tap or click a dot for details. You can also find names in the professor list.
Accounting · 74 reviews
Accounting · 28 reviews
Accounting · 21 reviews
Accounting · 42 reviews
Accounting · 43 reviews
Accounting · 23 reviews
Accounting · 79 reviews
Accounting · 25 reviews
Accounting · 31 reviews
Accounting · 36 reviews
Accounting · 1 review
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 15 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 18 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 15 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 9 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 7 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 1 review
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 12 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 6 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 12 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 12 reviews
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
Accounting · 1 review
Small sample. Read the reviews before deciding.
No eligible adjusted score in this period. The original ratings are still here.
| Professor | Quality | Difficulty | Reviews | Adjusted quality | Adjusted difficulty | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe HoyleAccounting | 4.38 | 74 | 4.37 | 4.12 | ||
| Abdullah KumasAccounting | 4.04 | 28 | 4.25 | 3.68 | ||
| Abbie SadlerAccounting | 3.24 | 21 | 4.17 | 3.21 | ||
| Philip RohrbachAccounting | 3.52 | 42 | 3.92 | 3.41 | ||
| Daniel PaikAccounting | 2.72 | 43 | 3.83 | 2.87 | ||
| Ashley AustinAccounting | 3.30 | 23 | 3.82 | 3.25 | ||
| Darrell WaldenAccounting | 2.78 | 79 | 3.76 | 2.86 | ||
| Valaria VendrzykAccounting | 2.48 | 25 | 3.69 | 2.79 | ||
| Marshall GeigerAccounting | 3.94 | 31 | 3.63 | 3.64 | ||
| Marbury FaganAccounting | 3.19 | 36 | 3.40 | 3.19 | ||
| Bella IsaacAccounting | 4.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Daniel SelbyAccounting | 2.87 | 15 | — | — | ||
| Jordyn FarizoAccounting | 2.72 | 18 | — | — | ||
| Joyce Van Der Laan SmithAccounting | 3.00 | 15 | — | — | ||
| Kip KrumweideAccounting | 3.89 | 9 | — | — | ||
| Mark HuffAccounting | 3.14 | 7 | — | — | ||
| Mary ScottAccounting | 3.00 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Nancy BagranoffAccounting | 3.42 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Raymond SlaughterAccounting | 1.83 | 6 | — | — | ||
| Robert PawlewiczAccounting | 2.67 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Robert SanbornAccounting | 2.92 | 12 | — | — | ||
| Robert TuckAccounting | 2.00 | 1 | — | — |
Quality and difficulty sorts use scores adjusted for review count. Missing adjusted scores appear last. How ratings work ↗